Why IQ tests don't test intelligence

Psychology March 7,1997 Why IQ tests dont test learning         The task of trying to quantify a persons intelligence has been a goal of psychologists since before the beginning of this century. The Binet-Simon scales were first proposed in 1905 in Paris, France and various sorts of tests have been evolving ever since. One of the important questions that evermore comes up regarding these tools is what be the tests really measuring rod? Are they measuring a persons intelligence? Their ability to practise well on standardized tests? Or just some arbitrary metre of the persons IQ? When examining the situations virtually which these tests are given and the content of the tests themselves, it becomes unvarnished that however useable the tests may be for standardizing a groups sharp ability, they are not a good indicator of intelligence.         To cut back a sincerely standardized test, the testing environs should be the same for everyo ne involved. If anything has been well-read from the psychology of perception, it is clear that a persons environment has a great deal to do with their cognitive abilities. Is the glisten flickering? Is the paint on the walls an unsettling shade? Is the temperature too racy or too cold? Is the chair uncomfortable? Or in the worst case, do they have an illness that day?

To test a persons mind, it is essential to utilize their body in the process. If everyones body is placed in antithetical conditions during the testing, how is it expected to pull down standardized results across all the subjects? Because of this assumption that everyone will serve ! equally independent of their environment, intelligence test scores are skewed and cannot be viewed as standardized, and definitely not as an example of a persons intelligence.         It is translucent that a persons intelligence stems from a variety of traits. If you want to get a full essay, coif it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay